[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4661065.SXhmWQNl5M@flatron>
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 18:42:17 +0200
From: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>
To: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Simon Glass <sjg@...omium.org>,
Luigi Semenzato <semenzato@...omium.org>,
Ilho Lee <ilho215.lee@...sung.com>,
김은기 <eunki_kim@...sung.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-samsung-soc <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] pinctrl: exynos: ack level-triggered interrupts before unmasking
On Thursday 13 of June 2013 09:38:33 Doug Anderson wrote:
> Kukjin,
>
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 5:04 AM, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>
wrote:
> > Doug Anderson wrote:
> >> A level-triggered interrupt should be acked after the interrupt line
> >> becomes inactive and before it is unmasked, or else another interrupt
> >> will be immediately triggered. Acking before or after calling the
> >> handler is not enough.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Luigi Semenzato <semenzato@...omium.org>
> >> Signed-off-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
> >
> > BTW, probably we need a similar fixing in the mach-exynos/common.c
> > file
> > before pinct기 for distro...
>
> Is anyone using the functions in mach-exynos/common.c file anymore? I
> thought that non-dt exynos support was going away and then we could
> just delete a whole lot of code from that file.
I think Kukjin meant stable kernels that support Exynos boards using board
files and without pinctrl. Would make sense to have them fixed as well, I
guess.
Best regards,
Tomasz
>
> -Doug
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists