[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51B9FE8E.9000109@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 10:17:02 -0700
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To: Tang Chen <tangchen@...fujitsu.com>
CC: tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...e.hu, hpa@...or.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, tj@...nel.org, trenn@...e.de,
yinghai@...nel.org, jiang.liu@...wei.com, wency@...fujitsu.com,
laijs@...fujitsu.com, isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com,
mgorman@...e.de, minchan@...nel.org, mina86@...a86.com,
gong.chen@...ux.intel.com, vasilis.liaskovitis@...fitbricks.com,
lwoodman@...hat.com, riel@...hat.com, jweiner@...hat.com,
prarit@...hat.com, x86@...nel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [Part3 PATCH v2 2/4] mem-hotplug: Skip LOCAL_NODE_DATA pages
in memory offline procedure.
On 06/13/2013 06:03 AM, Tang Chen wrote:
> +static inline bool is_local_node_data(struct page *page)
> +{
> + return (unsigned long)page->lru.next == LOCAL_NODE_DATA;
> +}
page->lru is already in a union. Could you please just add a new entry
to the union with a nice associated comment instead of reusing it this way?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists