[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51BA0051.6050205@candelatech.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 10:24:33 -0700
From: Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: "linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Question on rcu_access_pointer, rcu_assign_pointer and locking.
Hello!
I'm trying to better understand some code in net/mac80211/scan.c in order
to track down some memory leaks reported by kmemleak.
My question boils down to this. Assume we have code similar to this:
spin_lock_bh(&dev->bss_lock);
old = rcu_access_pointer(found->pub.beacon_ies);
rcu_assign_pointer(found->pub.beacon_ies, tmp->pub.beacon_ies);
if (old)
kfree_rcu((struct cfg80211_bss_ies *)old, rcu_head);
spin_unlock_bh(&dev->bss_lock);
Would it be possible to somehow leak what is assigned to found->pub.beacon_ies,
perhaps because two threads managed to go through this
code within a single RCU period?
I think that if the rcu_assign_pointer logic wasn't 'published'
before a second thread came through this logic it could cause
this leakage?
The actual code I'm curious about is in net/mac80211/scan.c, in
the cfg80211_bss_update method.
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists