linux-kernel - Re: [ 00/79] 3.9.6-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 13 Jun 2013 10:45:24 -0700
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	Kleber Sacilotto de Souza <klebers@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, Brian King <brking@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Subject: Re: [ 00/79] 3.9.6-stable review

On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 10:41:19AM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 05:53:01PM -0300, Kleber Sacilotto de Souza wrote:
> > On 06/12/2013 05:34 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > >On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 01:29:15PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > >>On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 01:02:26PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > >>>This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.9.6 release.
> > >>>There are 79 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > >>>to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > >>>let me know.
> > >>>
> > >>>Responses should be made by Thu Jun 13 19:50:17 UTC 2013.
> > >>>Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > >>>
> > >>>The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > >>>	kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.9.6-rc1.gz
> > >>>and the diffstat can be found below.
> > >>>
> > >>powerpc defconfig and as well as various other powerpc builds fail with:
> > >>
> > >>arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/msi.c: In function 'rtas_hack_32bit_msi_gen2':
> > >>arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/msi.c:408:34: error: 'struct pci_dev' has no member named 'msi_cap'
> > >>arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/msi.c:410:35: error: 'struct pci_dev' has no member named 'msi_cap'
> > >>arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/msi.c:411:35: error: 'struct pci_dev' has no member named 'msi_cap'
> > >>
> > >>Introduced by commit 7b58b0edaa2 (powerpc/pseries: Make 32-bit MSI quirk work
> > >>on systems lacking firmware support).
> > >>
> > >s/7b58b0edaa2/f1dd153121/
> > >
> > >7b58b0edaa2 is from my git branch and won't help much.
> > >
> > >Guenter
> > >
> > 
> > Guenter,
> > 
> > The original patch that introduced these changes (commit f1dd153121
> > - powerpc/pseries: Make 32-bit MSI quirk work on systems lacking
> > firmware support) depends on commit e375b561 (PCI: Cache MSI/MSI-X
> > capability offsets in struct pci_dev), however, the patch I sent to
> > the stable mailing-list were backported to be applied over 3.9.y. I
> > have already sent an email to Greg to let him know that the original
> > patch breaks the ppc build and the backported version should be
> > picked up instead.
> 
> Ok, I've now picked up the different patch.  It's quite different from
> the upstream version, but I'll trust you here...

Sorry, was looking at the wrong patch, it's "obviously" a correct
change, no worries, sorry for the noise.

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/