linux-kernel - Re: [BUGFIX 6/9] ACPI, DOCK: mark initialization functions with _

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4725934.hjsbtR4hAr@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date:	Thu, 13 Jun 2013 20:29:59 +0200
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To:	Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...wei.com>
Cc:	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
	"Alexander E . Patrakov" <patrakov@...il.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Yijing Wang <wangyijing@...wei.com>,
	Jiang Liu <liuj97@...il.com>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com>,
	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUGFIX 6/9] ACPI, DOCK: mark initialization functions with __init

On Friday, June 14, 2013 12:32:29 AM Jiang Liu wrote:
> Mark all initialization functions with __init to reduce memory
> consumption at runtime.

Again, this is a *cleanup*, not a fix.  Please don't mix cleanups with fixes,
especially with ones you want to go into 3.10, because the cleanups aren't
3.10 material for sure.

Thanks,
Rafael


> Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...wei.com>
> Cc: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com>
> Cc: Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
> Cc: linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/dock.c | 12 ++++++------
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/dock.c b/drivers/acpi/dock.c
> index cd2d5df..da3314d 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/dock.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/dock.c
> @@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ struct dock_dependent_device {
>   *
>   * Add the dependent device to the dock's dependent device list.
>   */
> -static int
> +static int __init
>  add_dock_dependent_device(struct dock_station *ds, acpi_handle handle)
>  {
>  	struct dock_dependent_device *dd;
> @@ -192,7 +192,7 @@ static int is_dock(acpi_handle handle)
>  	return 1;
>  }
>  
> -static int is_ejectable(acpi_handle handle)
> +static int __init is_ejectable(acpi_handle handle)
>  {
>  	acpi_status status;
>  	acpi_handle tmp;
> @@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ static int is_ejectable(acpi_handle handle)
>  	return 1;
>  }
>  
> -static int is_ata(acpi_handle handle)
> +static int __init is_ata(acpi_handle handle)
>  {
>  	acpi_handle tmp;
>  
> @@ -216,7 +216,7 @@ static int is_ata(acpi_handle handle)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -static int is_battery(acpi_handle handle)
> +static int __init is_battery(acpi_handle handle)
>  {
>  	struct acpi_device_info *info;
>  	int ret = 1;
> @@ -232,7 +232,7 @@ static int is_battery(acpi_handle handle)
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> -static int is_ejectable_bay(acpi_handle handle)
> +static int __init is_ejectable_bay(acpi_handle handle)
>  {
>  	acpi_handle phandle;
>  
> @@ -809,7 +809,7 @@ static struct notifier_block dock_acpi_notifier = {
>   * check to see if an object has an _EJD method.  If it does, then it
>   * will see if it is dependent on the dock station.
>   */
> -static acpi_status
> +static acpi_status __init
>  find_dock_devices(acpi_handle handle, u32 lvl, void *context, void **rv)
>  {
>  	acpi_status status;
> 
-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/