linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] devicetree bugfixes for v3.10

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <51BA4E07.7060001@wwwdotorg.org>
Date:	Thu, 13 Jun 2013 16:56:07 -0600
From:	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
To:	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
CC:	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
	Stephen Warren <SWarren@...dia.com>,
	devicetree-discuss <devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] devicetree bugfixes for v3.10

On 06/13/2013 04:52 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-06-13 at 23:22 +0100, Grant Likely wrote:
>> Grant Likely (2):
>>       dtc: Update generated files to output from Bison 2.5
>>       dtc: ensure #line directives don't consume data from the next 
> 
> Question. Are those fixes also in the upstream dtc from jdl ? Or have we
> effectively forked it ?

Patch 1 just edits generated files which don't exist upstream (the
kernel checks them in, but upstream relies on the user running Bison/...
as part of make).

Patch 2 is a cherry-pick from upstream (plus regenerating some
difference generated files)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/