[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130613234459.GE28664@moria.home.lan>
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 16:44:59 -0700
From: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@...gle.com>
To: Tejun Heo <theo@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] percpu-refcount: implement percpu_tryget() along
with percpu_ref_kill_and_confirm()
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 01:46:27PM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
> From de3c0749e2c1960afcc433fc5da136b85c8bd896 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
> Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 13:37:42 -0700
>
> Implement percpu_tryget() which succeeds iff the refcount hasn't been
> killed yet. Because the refcnt is per-cpu, different CPUs may have
> different perceptions on when the counter has been killed and tryget()
> may continue to succeed for a while after percpu_ref_kill() returns.
>
> For use cases where it's necessary to know when all CPUs start to see
> the refcnt as dead, percpu_ref_kill_and_confirm() is added. The new
> function takes an extra argument @confirm_kill which is invoked when
> the refcnt is guaranteed to be viewed as killed on all CPUs.
>
> While this isn't the prettiest interface, it doesn't force synchronous
> wait and is much safer than requiring the caller to do its own
> call_rcu().
>
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Acked-by: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@...gle.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists