linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/8] mm/writeback: fix wb_do

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130614090217.GA7574@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date:	Fri, 14 Jun 2013 11:02:17 +0200
From:	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
To:	Wanpeng Li <liwanp@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
	Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	Andrew Shewmaker <agshew@...il.com>,
	Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
	Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@...il.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] mm/writeback: fix wb_do_writeback exported unsafely

On Fri 14-06-13 15:30:34, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> There is just one caller in fs-writeback.c call wb_do_writeback and
> current codes unnecessary export it in header file, this patch fix
> it by changing wb_do_writeback to static function.

So what?

Besides that git grep wb_do_writeback tells that 
mm/backing-dev.c:                       wb_do_writeback(me, 0);

Have you tested this at all?

> Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <liwanp@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
>  fs/fs-writeback.c         | 2 +-
>  include/linux/writeback.h | 1 -
>  2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/fs-writeback.c b/fs/fs-writeback.c
> index 3be5718..f892dec 100644
> --- a/fs/fs-writeback.c
> +++ b/fs/fs-writeback.c
> @@ -959,7 +959,7 @@ static long wb_check_old_data_flush(struct bdi_writeback *wb)
>  /*
>   * Retrieve work items and do the writeback they describe
>   */
> -long wb_do_writeback(struct bdi_writeback *wb, int force_wait)
> +static long wb_do_writeback(struct bdi_writeback *wb, int force_wait)
>  {
>  	struct backing_dev_info *bdi = wb->bdi;
>  	struct wb_writeback_work *work;
> diff --git a/include/linux/writeback.h b/include/linux/writeback.h
> index 579a500..e27468e 100644
> --- a/include/linux/writeback.h
> +++ b/include/linux/writeback.h
> @@ -94,7 +94,6 @@ int try_to_writeback_inodes_sb_nr(struct super_block *, unsigned long nr,
>  void sync_inodes_sb(struct super_block *);
>  long writeback_inodes_wb(struct bdi_writeback *wb, long nr_pages,
>  				enum wb_reason reason);
> -long wb_do_writeback(struct bdi_writeback *wb, int force_wait);
>  void wakeup_flusher_threads(long nr_pages, enum wb_reason reason);
>  void inode_wait_for_writeback(struct inode *inode);
>  
> -- 
> 1.8.1.2
> 

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/