[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130614133314.6126.77315.stgit@ladj378.jer.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2013 16:33:14 +0300
From: Eliezer Tamir <eliezer.tamir@...ux.intel.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
Don Skidmore <donald.c.skidmore@...el.com>,
e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
Eric Dumazet <erdnetdev@...il.com>,
Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, HPA <hpa@...or.com>,
Eilon Greenstien <eilong@...adcom.com>,
Or Gerlitz <or.gerlitz@...il.com>,
Amir Vadai <amirv@...lanox.com>,
Alex Rosenbaum <alexr@...lanox.com>,
Avner Ben Hanoch <avnerb@...lanox.com>,
Or Kehati <ork@...lanox.com>, sockperf-dev@...glegroups.com,
Eliezer Tamir <eliezer@...ir.org.il>
Subject: [PATCH v5 net-next 0/4] net: low latency sockets follow ups
David,
Here are three clean up patches, plus one that adds a socket option for LLS.
Patch 1 converts sysctl_net_ll_poll into an unsigned int
Patch 2 converts low latency sockets to sched_clock.
Patch 3 removes the config menu for NET_LL_RX_POLL and defaults to y.
Patch 4 adds an SO_LL socket option to allow per-socket control of busy polling.
I will reply to this thread with a patch to sockperf that enables
the socket option. (unchanged from v2)
Again, thanks to everyone for their comments.
-Eliezer
Change log:
v5
- use time_after64() instead of time_after, suggested by Eric Dumazet.
v4
- Fixed possible overflow, pointed out by Eric Dumazet.
(reordered the patches)
v3
- Suggested by David Miller and Stephen Hemminger:
added a patch to covert from get_cycles() to sched_clock(),
remove dependency on X86_TSC.
- Suggested by Eric Dumazet:
un-exported sysctl_net_ll_poll since for now it's not needed in modules.
v2
- added a patch to convert sysctl_net_ll_poll into an unsigned int.
- suggested by Eric Dimazet: treat sk_ll_usec as a u_int rather than a u_long.
- suggested by Ben Huchings: allow unprivileged user to decrease SO_LL value,
correct return value when operation is not allowed.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists