[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51BB233B.3040009@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2013 22:05:47 +0800
From: Jiang Liu <liuj97@...il.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
CC: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...wei.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
"Alexander E . Patrakov" <patrakov@...il.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Yijing Wang <wangyijing@...wei.com>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUGFIX 5/9] ACPI, DOCK: kill redundant spin lock in dock device
object
On 06/14/2013 02:28 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Friday, June 14, 2013 12:32:28 AM Jiang Liu wrote:
>> All dock device related data structures are created during driver
>> initialization, so kill the redundant spin lock in dock device object.
>
> As a cleanup, it definitely makes sense, but does it fix anything?
>
> Rafael
Patch 3-9 are code cleanup only, I will resend them as separate patchset
later.
>
>
>> Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...wei.com>
>> Cc: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com>
>> Cc: Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
>> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
>> Cc: linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
>> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
>> ---
>> drivers/acpi/dock.c | 15 +++------------
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/dock.c b/drivers/acpi/dock.c
>> index 8e578aa..cd2d5df 100644
>> --- a/drivers/acpi/dock.c
>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/dock.c
>> @@ -57,7 +57,6 @@ struct dock_station {
>> acpi_handle handle;
>> unsigned long last_dock_time;
>> u32 flags;
>> - spinlock_t dd_lock;
>> struct mutex hp_lock;
>> struct task_struct *owner;
>> struct list_head dependent_devices;
>> @@ -107,10 +106,7 @@ add_dock_dependent_device(struct dock_station *ds, acpi_handle handle)
>> dd->handle = handle;
>> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dd->list);
>> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dd->hotplug_list);
>> -
>> - spin_lock(&ds->dd_lock);
>> list_add_tail(&dd->list, &ds->dependent_devices);
>> - spin_unlock(&ds->dd_lock);
>>
>> return 0;
>> }
>> @@ -168,14 +164,10 @@ find_dock_dependent_device(struct dock_station *ds, acpi_handle handle)
>> {
>> struct dock_dependent_device *dd;
>>
>> - spin_lock(&ds->dd_lock);
>> - list_for_each_entry(dd, &ds->dependent_devices, list) {
>> - if (handle == dd->handle) {
>> - spin_unlock(&ds->dd_lock);
>> + list_for_each_entry(dd, &ds->dependent_devices, list)
>> + if (handle == dd->handle)
>> return dd;
>> - }
>> - }
>> - spin_unlock(&ds->dd_lock);
>> +
>> return NULL;
>> }
>>
>> @@ -964,7 +956,6 @@ static int __init dock_add(acpi_handle handle)
>> dock_station->last_dock_time = jiffies - HZ;
>>
>> mutex_init(&dock_station->hp_lock);
>> - spin_lock_init(&dock_station->dd_lock);
>> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dock_station->sibling);
>> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dock_station->hotplug_devices);
>> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dock_station->dependent_devices);
>>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists