lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4881796E12491D4BB15146FE0209CE643F5E3A07@DE02WEMBXB.internal.synopsys.com>
Date:	Fri, 14 Jun 2013 14:14:20 +0000
From:	Alexey Brodkin <Alexey.Brodkin@...opsys.com>
To:	Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>
CC:	Alexey Brodkin <Alexey.Brodkin@...opsys.com>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
	"Joe Perches" <joe@...ches.com>,
	Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@...opsys.com>,
	Mischa Jonker <Mischa.Jonker@...opsys.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
	Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
	Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org" 
	<devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ethernet/arc/arc_emac - Add new driver

On 06/14/2013 02:20 AM, Francois Romieu wrote:
> Alexey Brodkin <Alexey.Brodkin@...opsys.com> :
> [...]
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/arc/arc_emac.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/arc/arc_emac.h
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..6691db2
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/arc/arc_emac.h
> [...]
>> +struct arc_emac_priv {
>> +	struct net_device_stats stats;
>> +	unsigned int clock_frequency;
>> +	unsigned int max_speed;
>> +
>> +	/* Pointers to BD rings - CPU side */
>> +	struct arc_emac_bd_t *rxbd;
>
> There does not seem to be much need for rxbd->data.

Could you please clarify this comment? Not clear what do you mean.

>> +	struct arc_emac_bd_t *txbd;
>
> [...]
>> +static int arc_emac_get_settings(struct net_device *ndev,
>> +				 struct ethtool_cmd *cmd)
>> +{
>> +	struct arc_emac_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
>> +
>> +	if (priv->phy_dev)
>> +		return phy_ethtool_gset(priv->phy_dev, cmd);
>
> arc_emac_probe() succeeded : priv->phy_dev can't be NULL.
>
> [...]
>> +static int arc_emac_set_settings(struct net_device *ndev,
>> +				 struct ethtool_cmd *cmd)
>> +{
>> +	struct arc_emac_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
>> +
>> +	if (!capable(CAP_NET_ADMIN))
>> +		return -EPERM;
>> +
>> +	if (priv->phy_dev)
>> +		return phy_ethtool_sset(priv->phy_dev, cmd);
>
> priv->phy_dev can't be NULL either.

Nice catch! Fortunately I recognized it as well and already removed 
those useless checks.

> [...]
>> +static int arc_emac_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
>> +{
>> +	struct net_device *ndev = napi->dev;
>> +	struct arc_emac_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
>> +	unsigned int i, loop, work_done = 0;
>> +	struct sk_buff *skb;
>> +
>> +	/* Loop thru the BD chain, but not always from 0.
>> +	 * Start from right after where we last saw a packet.
>> +	 */
>> +	i = priv->last_rx_bd;
>> +
>> +	for (loop = 0; loop < RX_BD_NUM; loop++) {
>> +		struct net_device_stats *stats = &priv->stats;
>> +		struct buffer_state *rx_buff;
>> +		struct arc_emac_bd_t *rxbd;
>> +		dma_addr_t addr;
>> +		unsigned int info, pktlen;
>> +		unsigned int buflen = ndev->mtu + EMAC_BUFFER_PAD;
>> +
>> +		i = (i + 1) % RX_BD_NUM;
>> +		rx_buff = &priv->rx_buff[i];
>> +		rxbd = &priv->rxbd[i];
>> +		info = rxbd->info;
>
> You may / should update 'i' so that you can:
>
> 		struct buffer_state *rx_buff = priv->rx_buff + i;
> 		struct arc_emac_bd_t *rxbd = priv->rxbd + i;
> 		unsigned int pktlen, info = rxbd->info;

Done)

>> +
>> +		/* Process current BD */
>> +
>> +		if (unlikely((info & OWN_MASK) == FOR_EMAC)) {
>> +			/* BD is still owned by EMAC */
>> +			continue;
>> +		}
>
> Processing starts at priv->last_rx_bd. Could it not be a 'break' ?

It has to be! Fixed.

> [...]
>> +		pktlen = info & LEN_MASK;
>> +		stats->rx_packets++;
>> +		stats->rx_bytes += pktlen;
>> +		skb = rx_buff->skb;
>> +		skb_put(skb, pktlen);
>> +		skb->dev = ndev;
>> +		skb->protocol = eth_type_trans(skb, ndev);
>> +		netif_receive_skb(skb);
>> +
>> +		dma_unmap_single(&ndev->dev,
>> +				 dma_unmap_addr(&rx_buff, addr),
>> +				 dma_unmap_len(&rx_buff, len),
>> +				 DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
>
> 		dma_unmap_single(&ndev->dev, dma_unmap_addr(&rx_buff, addr),
> 				 dma_unmap_len(&rx_buff, len), DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
>
> Please unmap before netif_receive_skb.

Done. Thanks.

>> +
>> +		/* Prepare the BD for next cycle */
>> +		rx_buff->skb = netdev_alloc_skb_ip_align(ndev, buflen);
>> +		if (unlikely(!rx_buff->skb)) {
>> +			if (net_ratelimit())
>> +				netdev_err(ndev, "cannot allocate skb\n");
>> +			stats->rx_errors++;
>> +			continue;
>> +		}
>
> The descriptor entry is left unchanged. Afaiu the driver will move to the
> next descriptor and crash on dereferencing NULL (rx_buff->)skb next time
> it wraps.
>
> I suggest avoiding holes: don't netif_receive_skb if you can't alloc a new
> skb.

Frankly I cannot understand how "don't netif_receive_skb" for one of the 
received packets helps to prevent crash on the next iteration?
And I don't see a way to return any error state from NAPI poll handler.
Could you please clarify your idea?

> [...]
>> +static irqreturn_t arc_emac_intr(int irq, void *dev_instance)
>> +{
>> +	struct net_device *ndev = dev_instance;
>> +	struct arc_emac_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
>> +	struct net_device_stats *stats = &priv->stats;
>> +	unsigned int status;
>> +
>> +	status = arc_reg_get(priv, R_STATUS);
>> +	status &= ~MDIO_MASK;
>> +
>> +	/* Reset all flags except "MDIO complete"*/
>> +	arc_reg_set(priv, R_STATUS, status);
>> +
>> +	if (status & RXINT_MASK) {
>> +		if (likely(napi_schedule_prep(&priv->napi))) {
>> +			arc_reg_clr(priv, R_ENABLE, RXINT_MASK);
>> +			__napi_schedule(&priv->napi);
>> +		}
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	if (status & TXINT_MASK) {
>
> You may consider moving everything into the napi poll handler.

Agree. Would be good - implementing.

> [...]
>> +static int arc_emac_open(struct net_device *ndev)
>> +{
>> +	struct arc_emac_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
>> +	struct phy_device *phy_dev = priv->phy_dev;
>> +	struct arc_emac_bd_t *bd;
>> +	struct sk_buff *skb;
>> +	int i;
>> +
>> +	phy_dev->autoneg = AUTONEG_ENABLE;
>> +	phy_dev->speed = 0;
>> +	phy_dev->duplex = 0;
>> +	phy_dev->advertising = phy_dev->supported;
>> +
>> +	if (priv->max_speed > 100) {
>> +		phy_dev->advertising &= PHY_GBIT_FEATURES;
>> +	} else if (priv->max_speed <= 100) {
>> +		phy_dev->advertising &= PHY_BASIC_FEATURES;
>> +		if (priv->max_speed <= 10) {
>> +			phy_dev->advertising &= ~SUPPORTED_100baseT_Half;
>> +			phy_dev->advertising &= ~SUPPORTED_100baseT_Full;
>> +		}
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	/* Allocate and set buffers for Rx BD's */
>> +	bd = priv->rxbd;
>> +	for (i = 0; i < RX_BD_NUM; i++) {
>> +		skb = netdev_alloc_skb_ip_align(ndev, ndev->mtu +
>> +						EMAC_BUFFER_PAD);
>> +
>
> Missing NULL check.

Thanks!

> [...]
>> +	/* Set BD ring pointers for device side */
>> +	arc_reg_set(priv, R_RX_RING,
>> +		     (unsigned int)priv->rxbd_dma_hdl);
>
> 	arc_reg_set(priv, R_RX_RING, (unsigned int)priv->rxbd_dma_hdl);
>
>> +
>> +	arc_reg_set(priv, R_TX_RING,
>> +		     (unsigned int)priv->rxbd_dma_hdl + RX_RING_SZ);
>
> Forgot priv->txbd_dma_hdl ?

Well, it was used implicitly, because priv->rxbd_dma_hdl + RX_RING_SZ = 
priv->txbd_dma_hdl. Replaced with explicit priv->txbd_dma_hdl.

>> +
>> +	/* Set Poll rate so that it polls every 1 ms */
>> +	arc_reg_set(priv, R_POLLRATE,
>> +		     priv->clock_frequency / 1000000);
>
> 	arc_reg_set(priv, R_POLLRATE, priv->clock_frequency / 1000000);
>
>> +
>> +	/* Enable interrupts */
>> +	arc_reg_set(priv, R_ENABLE,
>> +		     TXINT_MASK | RXINT_MASK | ERR_MASK);
>
> 	arc_reg_set(priv, R_ENABLE, TXINT_MASK | RXINT_MASK | ERR_MASK);

I see, thanks.

>> +
>> +	/* Set CONTROL */
>> +	arc_reg_set(priv, R_CTRL,
>> +		     (RX_BD_NUM << 24) |	/* RX BD table length */
>> +		     (TX_BD_NUM << 16) |	/* TX BD table length */
>> +		     TXRN_MASK | RXRN_MASK);
>> +
>> +	/* Enable EMAC */
>> +	arc_reg_or(priv, R_CTRL, EN_MASK);
>> +
>> +	phy_start_aneg(priv->phy_dev);
>> +
>> +	netif_start_queue(ndev);
>> +	napi_enable(&priv->napi);
>
> napi must be enabled before the first rx packet / irq kicks in.

Thanks.

> [...]
>> +static int arc_emac_tx(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *ndev)
>> +{
>> +	struct arc_emac_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
>> +	unsigned int info, len, *txbd_curr = &priv->txbd_curr;
>> +	dma_addr_t addr;
>> +	char *pkt = skb->data;
>> +
>> +	len = max_t(unsigned int, ETH_ZLEN, skb->len);
>
> The device automatically pads, right ?

What do you mean here?

>> +	info = priv->txbd[*txbd_curr].info;
>> +
>> +	/* EMAC still holds this buffer in its possession.
>> +	 * CPU must not modify this buffer descriptor
>> +	 */
>> +	if (unlikely((info & OWN_MASK) == FOR_EMAC)) {
>> +		netif_stop_queue(ndev);
>> +		return NETDEV_TX_BUSY;
>
> It is more than unlikely: you may check for it as a bug but you should
> stop_queue when the tx ring is full (before returning below).

So I left this check, but add another one near bottom of Tx function to 
prevent mentioned situation.

>> +	}
>> +
>> +	addr = dma_map_single(&ndev->dev, (void *)pkt, len, DMA_TO_DEVICE);
>> +	if (unlikely(dma_mapping_error(&ndev->dev, addr))) {
>> +		dev_kfree_skb(skb);
>> +		return NETDEV_TX_OK;
>
> Please update tx_dropped stats.

Done.

>> +	}
>> +	dma_unmap_addr_set(&priv->tx_buff[*txbd_curr], mapping, addr);
>> +	dma_unmap_len_set(&priv->tx_buff[*txbd_curr], len, len);
>> +
>> +	priv->tx_buff[*txbd_curr].skb = skb;
>> +	priv->txbd[*txbd_curr].data = pkt;
>
> Insert memory barrier.

Very good and useful point, done with verbose comment.

>> +	priv->txbd[*txbd_curr].info = FOR_EMAC | FRST_MASK | LAST_MASK | len;
>> +
>> +	*txbd_curr = (*txbd_curr + 1) % TX_BD_NUM;
>> +
>> +	arc_reg_set(priv, R_STATUS, TXPL_MASK);
>> +
>> +	skb_tx_timestamp(skb);
>> +
>> +	return NETDEV_TX_OK;
>> +}
>
> [...]
>> +static int arc_emac_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> +{
> [...]
>> +	err = arc_mdio_probe(pdev->dev.of_node, priv);
>> +	if (err) {
>> +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to probe MII bus\n");
>> +		goto out;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +
>> +	priv->phy_dev = of_phy_connect(ndev, priv->phy_node,
>> +				       arc_emac_adjust_link, 0,
>> +				       PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_MII);
>> +	if (!priv->phy_dev) {
>> +		netdev_err(ndev, "of_phy_connect() failed\n");
>> +		return -ENODEV;
>
> arc_mdio_remove leak.

Indeed) Fixed.

-Alexey


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ