lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 14 Jun 2013 17:24:30 +0200
From:	Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
To:	Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>
Cc:	Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>,
	linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
	Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@...e-electrons.com>,
	Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Nicolas Pitre <nico@...xnic.net>,
	Lior Amsalem <alior@...vell.com>,
	Maen Suleiman <maen@...vell.com>,
	Tawfik Bayouk <tawfik@...vell.com>,
	Shadi Ammouri <shadi@...vell.com>,
	Eran Ben-Avi <benavi@...vell.com>,
	Yehuda Yitschak <yehuday@...vell.com>,
	Nadav Haklai <nadavh@...vell.com>,
	Ike Pan <ike.pan@...onical.com>,
	Chris Van Hoof <vanhoof@...onical.com>,
	Dan Frazier <dann.frazier@...onical.com>,
	Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@....com>,
	Jon Masters <jcm@...hat.com>,
	David Marlin <dmarlin@...hat.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Zbigniew Bodek <zbb@...ihalf.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] i2c-mv64xxx: Fix timing issue on Armada XP (errata
 FE-8471889)

On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 06:25:00PM +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> Dear Gregory CLEMENT,
> 
> On Fri,  7 Jun 2013 17:48:59 +0200, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
> 
> > +/*
> > + * 5us delay in order to avoid repeated start
> > + * timing violation on Armada XP SoC.
> > + */
> > +static int mv64xxx_i2c_errata_delay;
> 
> This should probably be a per-I2C controller variable, i.e in
> mv64xxx_i2c_data.

Yes.

> 
> 
> > +	if (!mv64xxx_i2c_errata_delay &&
> > +	    of_machine_is_compatible("marvell,armadaxp"))
> > +		mv64xxx_i2c_errata_delay = 1;
> 
> I am wondering whether it should be done this way, or using a separate
> DT property.

Need to think about it. It is similar to the sda-hold-time issue, I
guess.


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ