[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130614152430.GF2929@katana>
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2013 17:24:30 +0200
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
To: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>
Cc: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@...e-electrons.com>,
Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Nicolas Pitre <nico@...xnic.net>,
Lior Amsalem <alior@...vell.com>,
Maen Suleiman <maen@...vell.com>,
Tawfik Bayouk <tawfik@...vell.com>,
Shadi Ammouri <shadi@...vell.com>,
Eran Ben-Avi <benavi@...vell.com>,
Yehuda Yitschak <yehuday@...vell.com>,
Nadav Haklai <nadavh@...vell.com>,
Ike Pan <ike.pan@...onical.com>,
Chris Van Hoof <vanhoof@...onical.com>,
Dan Frazier <dann.frazier@...onical.com>,
Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@....com>,
Jon Masters <jcm@...hat.com>,
David Marlin <dmarlin@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Zbigniew Bodek <zbb@...ihalf.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] i2c-mv64xxx: Fix timing issue on Armada XP (errata
FE-8471889)
On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 06:25:00PM +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> Dear Gregory CLEMENT,
>
> On Fri, 7 Jun 2013 17:48:59 +0200, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
>
> > +/*
> > + * 5us delay in order to avoid repeated start
> > + * timing violation on Armada XP SoC.
> > + */
> > +static int mv64xxx_i2c_errata_delay;
>
> This should probably be a per-I2C controller variable, i.e in
> mv64xxx_i2c_data.
Yes.
>
>
> > + if (!mv64xxx_i2c_errata_delay &&
> > + of_machine_is_compatible("marvell,armadaxp"))
> > + mv64xxx_i2c_errata_delay = 1;
>
> I am wondering whether it should be done this way, or using a separate
> DT property.
Need to think about it. It is similar to the sda-hold-time issue, I
guess.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists