linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/9 v3] RFC: timekeeping: rtc: change hctosys mechanism

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <51BB527A.9050101@linaro.org>
Date:	Fri, 14 Jun 2013 10:27:22 -0700
From:	John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
To:	Alexander Holler <holler@...oftware.de>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	rtc-linux@...glegroups.com, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9 v3] RFC: timekeeping: rtc: change hctosys mechanism

On 06/14/2013 09:52 AM, Alexander Holler wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Because I've become a request which made me slightly more optimistic about
> the RFC patches, I've spend some more time on the patches doing cosmetic.
> I know think the "quickly done" is gone and they might be ready for
> submission.
>
> The whole series consists more or less of 3 mini-series.

In the future, it might be easier if you split the series up into 
separate patchsets. That way it makes the dependencies clear.

For instance, 1-3 I've got no objection to, and 7-9 are getting there, 
but the middle three patches are probably going to need a good bit more 
work.

thanks
-john

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/