[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51BB5C6D.5070308@elopez.com.ar>
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2013 15:09:49 -0300
From: Emilio López <emilio@...pez.com.ar>
To: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
CC: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kevin@...winnertech.com, sunny@...winnertech.com,
shuge@...winnertech.com
Subject: Re: [linux-sunxi] [PATCH 5/6] ARM: sunxi: Add Olimex A10s-Olinuxino-micro
device tree
Hi Maxime,
El 09/06/13 13:36, Maxime Ripard escribió:
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/boot/dts/sun5i-a10s-olinuxino-micro.dts | 75 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 75 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/sun5i-a10s-olinuxino-micro.dts
Please add this on the sunxi target in arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile so it
gets built on make dtbs.
(snip)
> + leds {
> + compatible = "gpio-leds";
> + pinctrl-names = "default";
> + pinctrl-0 = <&led_pins_olinuxino>;
> +
> + power {
> + gpios = <&pio 4 3 0>;
> + default-state = "on";
> + };
Also, as discussed on IRC, I think it would be wise to change the name
on the LED node. The schematics have a 'power' led already that is
hard-wired to 3.3v, and this led node that you are declaring is referred
as 'led1' there. I suppose 'green' would be a suitable name to keep
consistency with other sunxi boards (namely cubieboard).
Other than that, my OLinuXino worked just fine after applying this
patchset, so
Tested-by: Emilio López <emilio@...pez.com.ar>
Thanks!
Emilio
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists