[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130614224708.GA15085@teo>
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2013 15:47:09 -0700
From: Anton Vorontsov <anton@...msg.org>
To: Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...il.com>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Colin Cross <ccross@...roid.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] pstore/ram for 3.11
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 05:32:16PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/4/9/831
>
> The main discussion was around the write-combining change which I
> dropped. You can pick patches 2 and 3 off the mail list if you prefer. I
> would assume they only require an ack from one of the 4 of you which
> pulling the tree implicitly does.
I've just re-reviewed the discussion. I see Colin was talking about ftrace
causing infinite loops due to recursion. Once I stumbled onto this too
(but the issue itself was due to missing 'notrace' mark), and Stephen told
that recursion protection is kind of mandatory:
http://lists.linaro.org/pipermail/linaro-kernel/2012-August/002084.html
I belive that the protection is actually there nowadays, and that is why
Rob does not see the problem with his patch.
So, I guess the patches are good, at least they fix real issues for Rob.
:)
Acked-by: Anton Vorontsov <anton@...msg.org>
(Or I can pick this via linux-pstore.git tree, I'll let Tony decide.)
Thanks!
Anton
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists