[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAE9FiQW1VJr7g+FAW0fr1Pxd2ut-nA=_O=3BQtRNYcTtzgezfw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 20:22:58 -0700
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To: "Alexander E. Patrakov" <patrakov@...il.com>
Cc: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...wei.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Yijing Wang <wangyijing@...wei.com>,
Jiang Liu <liuj97@...il.com>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [BUGFIX 0/9] Fix bug 59501 and code improvement for dock driver
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 7:06 PM, Alexander E. Patrakov
<patrakov@...il.com> wrote:
> 2013/6/14 Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>:
>> the 3) is about pci resource allocation?
>> because pcibios_add_bus is called too early?
>
> (3) is https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56531
>
>> If that is case, we should have something like attached patch for it.
>
> It does not even compile because the argument of pci_bus_add_devices()
> points to a const struct. You can't increment a member of it. And even
> if you remove the const from both the declaration and the definition
> of that function, the patch doesn't help at all.
>
> Here is /proc/ioports with the fixed-up patch:
dmesg with the fixed-up patch on v3.10-rc?
After look at the your dmesg v3.10-rc5, we really should move
pcibios_add_bus down.
as we do have children slots under ....
Yinghai
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists