[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1371259580.21896.18.camel@pasglop>
Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2013 11:26:20 +1000
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To: Waiman Long <waiman.long@...com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr.bueso@...com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Paul McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, ????????? <laijs@...fujitsu.com>,
Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@...ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>, niv@...ibm.com,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Valdis Kletnieks <Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Darren Hart <darren@...art.com>,
Fr??d??ric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Silas Boyd-Wickizer <sbw@....edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC ticketlock] Auto-queued ticketlock
On Fri, 2013-06-14 at 14:17 -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
>
> With some minor changes, the current patch can be modified to support
> debugging lock for 32-bit system. For 64-bit system, we can apply a
> similar concept for debugging lock with cmpxchg_double. However, for
> architecture that does not have cmpxchg_double support, it will be out
> of luck and we probably couldn't support the same feature in debugging
> mode. It will have to fall back to taking the lock.
That means only x86_64 and s390 would benefit from it ... I'm sure we can do better :-)
Cheers,
Ben.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists