[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1371285380.5789.42.camel@marge.simpson.net>
Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2013 10:36:20 +0200
From: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
To: Manfred Spraul <manfred@...orfullife.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr.bueso@...com>, hhuang@...hat.com,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] ipc/sem.c: performance improvements, FIFO
On Sat, 2013-06-15 at 09:30 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> Gee, just trying to flip back to a single semaphore lock mode if you had
> to do the global wait thing fixed up -rt.
But master wants a sharper rock tossed at it, it's still unstable.
Result matrix:
Thread 0: 11190947
Thread 1: 11743861
Thread 2: 10039223
Thread 3: 9776111
Thread 4: 9734815
Thread 5: 9941121
Thread 6: 11604118
Thread 7: 11716281
Thread 8: 9828587
Thread 9: 9589199
...
And that's one of the better samples. Probably -rt sleepy locks help
get us flipped back to single sem lock mode.
Hohum. On the bright side, -rt gets to scale better than mainline for a
little while, that's kinda different.
-Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists