[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130616172146.GA8533@redhat.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2013 19:21:46 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"zhangwei(Jovi)" <jovi.zhangwei@...wei.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] tracing/kprobes: Avoid perf_trace_buf_*() if
->perf_events is empty
perf_trace_buf_prepare() + perf_trace_buf_submit() make no sense
if this task/CPU has no active counters. Change kprobe_perf_func()
and kretprobe_perf_func() to check call->perf_events beforehand
and return if this list is empty.
For example, "perf record -e some_probe -p1". Only /sbin/init will
report, all other threads which hit the same probe will do
perf_trace_buf_prepare/perf_trace_buf_submit just to realize that
nobody wants perf_swevent_event().
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
---
kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c | 12 ++++++++----
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c b/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c
index 9f46e98..c0af476 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c
@@ -1157,6 +1157,10 @@ kprobe_perf_func(struct trace_probe *tp, struct pt_regs *regs)
int size, __size, dsize;
int rctx;
+ head = this_cpu_ptr(call->perf_events);
+ if (hlist_empty(head))
+ return;
+
dsize = __get_data_size(tp, regs);
__size = sizeof(*entry) + tp->size + dsize;
size = ALIGN(__size + sizeof(u32), sizeof(u64));
@@ -1172,8 +1176,6 @@ kprobe_perf_func(struct trace_probe *tp, struct pt_regs *regs)
entry->ip = (unsigned long)tp->rp.kp.addr;
memset(&entry[1], 0, dsize);
store_trace_args(sizeof(*entry), tp, regs, (u8 *)&entry[1], dsize);
-
- head = this_cpu_ptr(call->perf_events);
perf_trace_buf_submit(entry, size, rctx,
entry->ip, 1, regs, head, NULL);
}
@@ -1189,6 +1191,10 @@ kretprobe_perf_func(struct trace_probe *tp, struct kretprobe_instance *ri,
int size, __size, dsize;
int rctx;
+ head = this_cpu_ptr(call->perf_events);
+ if (hlist_empty(head))
+ return;
+
dsize = __get_data_size(tp, regs);
__size = sizeof(*entry) + tp->size + dsize;
size = ALIGN(__size + sizeof(u32), sizeof(u64));
@@ -1204,8 +1210,6 @@ kretprobe_perf_func(struct trace_probe *tp, struct kretprobe_instance *ri,
entry->func = (unsigned long)tp->rp.kp.addr;
entry->ret_ip = (unsigned long)ri->ret_addr;
store_trace_args(sizeof(*entry), tp, regs, (u8 *)&entry[1], dsize);
-
- head = this_cpu_ptr(call->perf_events);
perf_trace_buf_submit(entry, size, rctx,
entry->ret_ip, 1, regs, head, NULL);
}
--
1.5.5.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists