[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <lsq.1371420098.857388262@decadent.org.uk>
Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2013 23:01:38 +0100
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
CC: akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Johannes Weiner" <hannes@...xchg.org>,
"Hugh Dickins" <hughd@...gle.com>,
"Rafael Aquini" <aquini@...hat.com>,
"Shaohua Li" <shli@...nel.org>,
"KOSAKI Motohiro" <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: [76/83] swap: avoid read_swap_cache_async() race to deadlock
while waiting on discard I/O completion
3.2.47-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Rafael Aquini <aquini@...hat.com>
commit cbab0e4eec299e9059199ebe6daf48730be46d2b upstream.
read_swap_cache_async() can race against get_swap_page(), and stumble
across a SWAP_HAS_CACHE entry in the swap map whose page wasn't brought
into the swapcache yet.
This transient swap_map state is expected to be transitory, but the
actual placement of discard at scan_swap_map() inserts a wait for I/O
completion thus making the thread at read_swap_cache_async() to loop
around its -EEXIST case, while the other end at get_swap_page() is
scheduled away at scan_swap_map(). This can leave the system deadlocked
if the I/O completion happens to be waiting on the CPU waitqueue where
read_swap_cache_async() is busy looping and !CONFIG_PREEMPT.
This patch introduces a cond_resched() call to make the aforementioned
read_swap_cache_async() busy loop condition to bail out when necessary,
thus avoiding the subtle race window.
Signed-off-by: Rafael Aquini <aquini@...hat.com>
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Acked-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
---
mm/swap_state.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/mm/swap_state.c
+++ b/mm/swap_state.c
@@ -314,8 +314,24 @@ struct page *read_swap_cache_async(swp_e
* Swap entry may have been freed since our caller observed it.
*/
err = swapcache_prepare(entry);
- if (err == -EEXIST) { /* seems racy */
+ if (err == -EEXIST) {
radix_tree_preload_end();
+ /*
+ * We might race against get_swap_page() and stumble
+ * across a SWAP_HAS_CACHE swap_map entry whose page
+ * has not been brought into the swapcache yet, while
+ * the other end is scheduled away waiting on discard
+ * I/O completion at scan_swap_map().
+ *
+ * In order to avoid turning this transitory state
+ * into a permanent loop around this -EEXIST case
+ * if !CONFIG_PREEMPT and the I/O completion happens
+ * to be waiting on the CPU waitqueue where we are now
+ * busy looping, we just conditionally invoke the
+ * scheduler here, if there are some more important
+ * tasks to run.
+ */
+ cond_resched();
continue;
}
if (err) { /* swp entry is obsolete ? */
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists