[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130616231041.GF28664@moria.home.lan>
Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2013 16:10:41 -0700
From: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@...gle.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH percpu/for-3.11] percpu-refcount: use RCU-sched insted of
normal RCU
On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 02:55:46PM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
> percpu-refcount was incorrectly using preempt_disable/enable() for RCU
> critical sections against call_rcu(). 6a24474da8 ("percpu-refcount:
> consistently use plain (non-sched) RCU") fixed it by converting the
> preepmtion operations with rcu_read_[un]lock() citing that there isn't
> any advantage in using sched-RCU over using the usual one; however,
> rcu_read_[un]lock() for the preemptible RCU implementation -
> CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU, chosen when CONFIG_PREEMPT - are slightly
> more expensive than preempt_disable/enable().
>
> In a contrived microbench which repeats the followings,
>
> - percpu_ref_get()
> - copy 32 bytes of data into percpu buffer
> - percpu_put_get()
> - copy 32 bytes of data into percpu buffer
>
> rcu_read_[un]lock() used in percpu_ref_get/put() makes it go slower by
> about 15% when compared to using sched-RCU.
>
> As the RCU critical sections are extremely short, using sched-RCU
> shouldn't have any latency implications. Convert to RCU-sched.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
> Cc: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@...gle.com>
> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Acked-by: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@...gle.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists