[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51BE6BFC.3030009@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 09:53:00 +0800
From: Zhang Yanfei <zhangyanfei@...fujitsu.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
CC: Zhang Yanfei <zhangyanfei.yes@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: Add unlikely for current_order test
Hi David,
On 06/17/2013 02:04 AM, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Sat, 15 Jun 2013, Zhang Yanfei wrote:
>
>> From: Zhang Yanfei <zhangyanfei@...fujitsu.com>
>>
>> Since we have an unlikely for the "current_order >= pageblock_order / 2"
>> test above, adding an unlikely for this "current_order >= pageblock_order"
>> test seems more appropriate.
>>
>
> I don't understand the justification at all, current_order being unlikely
> greater than or equal to pageblock_order / 2 doesn't imply at all that
> it's unlikely that current_order is greater than or equal to
> pageblock_order.
>
hmmm... I am confused. Since current_order is >= pageblock_order / 2 is unlikely,
why current_order is >= pageblock_order isn't unlikely. Or there are other
tips?
Actually, I am also a little confused about why current_order should be
unlikely greater than or equal to pageblock_order / 2. When borrowing pages
with other migrate_type, we always search from MAX_ORDER-1, which is greater
or equal to pageblock_order.
--
Thanks.
Zhang Yanfei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists