[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130617084106.GE16699@lukather>
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 10:41:06 +0200
From: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Emilio Lopez <emilio@...pez.com.ar>, kevin@...winnertech.com,
sunny@...winnertech.com, shuge@...winnertech.com,
linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] pinctrl: sunxi: Move the pins definitions to a
separate header
Hi Linus,
On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 01:03:09PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 6:36 PM, Maxime Ripard
> <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com> wrote:
>
> > It will allow us to have a cleaner separation between the data needed by
> > the driver to work, and the core logic of the driver in itself, and will
> > allow having too much noise in the core driver in the future.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
>
> Patch applied.
>
> Since you will anyway have to bring the ARM SoC branch on
> top of the pinctrl tree, I might as well apply this to my tree.
Thanks for merging this.
I applied the other patches except for the 5th one that Emilio commented
on.
> If everything else fails, you'll have a nice development base
> in v3.11 with this in place, right?
Yes, As far as I can see, we should have a pretty complete support for
the GPIO/muxing/IRQ on the "old" allwinner SoCs (sun4i and sun5i) now.
Maxime
--
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists