[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <04994E22-F6D8-4786-9E2D-94D811C8020B@jcrosoft.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 11:27:38 +0200
From: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@...osoft.com>
To: "Ferre, Nicolas" <Nicolas.FERRE@...el.com>
Cc: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
"Yang, Wenyou" <Wenyou.Yang@...el.com>,
"alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com"
<alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"Desroches, Ludovic" <Ludovic.Desroches@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] at91: soc updates for 3.11 #1
On Jun 17, 2013, at 11:20 AM, "Ferre, Nicolas" <Nicolas.FERRE@...el.com> wrote:
> From: Olof Johansson [olof@...om.net]
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 11:42:18PM +0200, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
>>> Arnd, Olof,
>>>
>>> A little AT91 pull-request for patches that are more targeted to SoC/boards
>>> modifications. It is prepared on top of the arm-soc/at91/cleanup branch.
>>>
>>> Thanks, best regards,
>>>
>>> The following changes since commit b3f442b0eedbc20b5ce3f4a96530588d14901199:
>>>
>>> ARM: at91: udpate defconfigs (2013-05-17 15:05:08 +0200)
>>>
>>> are available in the git repository at:
>>>
>>> git://github.com/at91linux/linux-at91.git tags/at91-soc
>>>
>>> for you to fetch changes up to 7e75545ea7fb972c3da759f92c3d0be84d1cee72:
>>>
>>> ARM: at91: drop rm9200dk board support (2013-06-14 23:34:11 +0200)
>>>
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>>> Two non critical fixes that can go in 3.11.
>>> An old board removed.
>>>
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>>> Alexandre Belloni (1):
>>> ARM: at91: Fix link breakage when !CONFIG_PHYLIB
>>
>> Fix
>>
>>> Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD (1):
>>> ARM: at91: drop rm9200dk board support
>>
>> Cleanup
>>
>>> Wenyou Yang (1):
>>> ARM: at91: Change the internal SRAM memory type MT_MEMORY_NONCACHED
>>
>> Fix
>>
>> ...assuming, of course, that none of the fixes are for errors introduced in
>> some branch we already pulled, since then they should go on top of that branch.
>
> I do agree with you but:
> 1/ the fixes are non-critical ones, so I do not see the need for another branch
> 2/ I didn't feel like touching the "cleanup" branch because we want to base all our 3.11 material on top of it, without adding new patches on top.
I do agree with Nico on this as the cleanup this time was done early to avoid nightmare conflict so I prefer we do not touch it
Best Regards,
J.
>
> But, tell me if you think that it is too cautious...
>
> Bye,
> --
> Nicolas Ferre
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists