[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51BEDE09.1050307@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 17:59:37 +0800
From: Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com>
To: Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>
CC: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>,
Preeti U Murthy <preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Michael Wang <wangyun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Jason Low <jason.low2@...com>
Subject: Re: [RFC patch 1/4] sched: change cfs_rq load avg to unsigned long
On 06/17/2013 05:49 PM, Paul Turner wrote:
>>> >> Hi Alex,
>>> >>
>>> >> I just want to point out that we can't have more than 48388 tasks with
>>> >> highest priority on a runqueue with an unsigned long on a 32 bits
>>> >> system. I don't know if we can reach such kind of limit on a 32bits
>>> >> machine ? For sure, not on an embedded system.
> This should be ok.
>
> Note that:
> runnable_load_avg = \Sum se->load_avg_contrib <= \Sum
> se->load.weight = cfs_rq->load.weight
>
> And load_weight uses unsigned longs also.
>
> blocked_load_avg must be also safe since anything appearing in blocked
> load could have appeared in runnable load and we've said that was ok
> above.
>
> Reviewed-By: Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>
>
thanks for review!
--
Thanks
Alex
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists