[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51BF16C6.7070009@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 22:01:42 +0800
From: Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com>
To: Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Preeti U Murthy <preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Michael Wang <wangyun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Jason Low <jason.low2@...com>,
Changlong Xie <changlongx.xie@...el.com>, sgruszka@...hat.com,
Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [patch v8 8/9] sched: consider runnable load average in move_tasks
On 06/17/2013 06:58 PM, Paul Turner wrote:
>> > + unsigned long tmp_rla;
>> > + tmp_rla = tg->parent->cfs_rq[cpu]->runnable_load_avg + 1;
>> > +
>> > load = tg->parent->cfs_rq[cpu]->h_load;
>> > - load *= tg->se[cpu]->load.weight;
>> > - load /= tg->parent->cfs_rq[cpu]->load.weight + 1;
>> > + load *= tg->se[cpu]->avg.load_avg_contrib;
>> > + load /= tmp_rla;
> Why do we need the temporary here?
>
you'r right. tmp_rla is not necessary here.
--
Thanks
Alex
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists