[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130617132607.GA10671@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 18:56:07 +0530
From: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>
To: Xiang Wang <wangxfdu@...il.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <djbw@...com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
cxie4@...vell.com, Xiang Wang <wangx@...vell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dma: mmp_pdma: add protect when alloc/free phy
channels
On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 04:02:08PM +0800, Xiang Wang wrote:
> From: Xiang Wang <wangx@...vell.com>
>
> In mmp pdma, phy channels are allocated/freed dynamically
> and frequently. But no proper protection is added.
> Conflict will happen when multi-users are requesting phy
> channels at the same time. Use spinlock to protect.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xiang Wang <wangx@...vell.com>
> ---
> drivers/dma/mmp_pdma.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
> 1 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> +static void free_phy(struct mmp_pdma_chan *pchan)
pls namespace this
> +{
> + struct mmp_pdma_device *pdev = to_mmp_pdma_dev(pchan->chan.device);
> + unsigned long flags;
empty line pls
> + if (!pchan->phy)
> + return;
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&pdev->phy_lock, flags);
> + pchan->phy->vchan = NULL;
> + pchan->phy = NULL;
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pdev->phy_lock, flags);
> +}
> +
rest looks okay
--
~Vinod
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists