[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130617152823.GF5008@mwanda>
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 18:28:23 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: Lorenz Haspel <lorenz@...gers.com>
Cc: devel@...uxdriverproject.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
puff65537@...sheeslibrary.com, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
michael.banken@...he.stud.uni-erlangen.de,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...informatik.uni-erlangen.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] silicom: checkpatch: trailing statements
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 04:20:16PM +0200, Lorenz Haspel wrote:
> fixed checkpatch error:
> trailing statements that should be on next line
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Banken <michael.banken@...he.stud.uni-erlangen.de>
> Signed-off-by: Lorenz Haspel <lorenz@...gers.com>
> ---
> drivers/staging/silicom/bpctl_mod.c | 14 ++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/silicom/bpctl_mod.c b/drivers/staging/silicom/bpctl_mod.c
> index 78570dd..85aa900 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/silicom/bpctl_mod.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/silicom/bpctl_mod.c
> @@ -165,7 +165,9 @@ static int bp_device_event(struct notifier_block *unused,
> memcpy(&cbuf, drvinfo.bus_info, 32);
> buf = &cbuf[0];
>
> - while (*buf++ != ':') ;
> + while (*buf != ':')
> + buf++;
> + buf++;
No. This is more complicated than the original. While loops like
this are idiomatic in C. The way to fix this is just to do:
while (*buf++ != ':')
;
Same for the rest, just move the semi-colon down in every case.
regards,
dan carpenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists