linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/4] silicom: checkpatch: assignments in if conditions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130617170309.GH5008@mwanda>
Date:	Mon, 17 Jun 2013 20:03:09 +0300
From:	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To:	Lorenz Haspel <lorenz@...gers.com>
Cc:	devel@...uxdriverproject.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
	puff65537@...sheeslibrary.com, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
	michael.banken@...he.stud.uni-erlangen.de,
	devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...informatik.uni-erlangen.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] silicom: checkpatch: assignments in if conditions

On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 06:26:23PM +0200, Lorenz Haspel wrote:
> Fixes checkpatch error:
> There were assignments in if conditions, so I extracted them.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lorenz Haspel <lorenz@...gers.com>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Banken <michael.banken@...he.stud.uni-erlangen.de>

Signed-off-by is a legal thing like signing a document.  It could be
that Michael actually signed off on these, and that's fine.  Anyway,
I'm curious now, why is Michael signing off on these?

regards,
dan carpenter

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/