[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130617204922.GM5008@mwanda>
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 23:49:22 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: Lorenz Haspel <lorenz@...gers.com>, devel@...uxdriverproject.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, puff65537@...sheeslibrary.com,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, michael.banken@...he.stud.uni-erlangen.de,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...informatik.uni-erlangen.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4 v2] silicom: checkpatch: errors caused by macros
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 12:42:12PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-06-17 at 21:20 +0200, Lorenz Haspel wrote:
> > fixed checkpatch error:
> > added parenthesis around complex macro.
> >
> > Macro with return was only used once in the code,
> > so I expandet it in-place.
> []
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/silicom/bpctl_mod.c b/drivers/staging/silicom/bpctl_mod.c
> []
> > -#define lock_bpctl() \
> > -if (down_interruptible(&bpctl_sema)) { \
> > - return -ERESTARTSYS; \
> > -} \
> > -
> > #define unlock_bpctl() \
> > up(&bpctl_sema);
>
> Symmetry please.
>
> Most likely, this unlock_bpctl macro is only used once too.
> I suggest removing it as well.
>
Joe is right, of course, but this could be fixed in a later patch.
regards,
dan carpenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists