[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130617210636.GO32663@mtj.dyndns.org>
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 14:06:36 -0700
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Tang Chen <tangchen@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...e.hu, hpa@...or.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, trenn@...e.de, yinghai@...nel.org,
jiang.liu@...wei.com, wency@...fujitsu.com, laijs@...fujitsu.com,
isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com, mgorman@...e.de,
minchan@...nel.org, mina86@...a86.com, gong.chen@...ux.intel.com,
vasilis.liaskovitis@...fitbricks.com, lwoodman@...hat.com,
riel@...hat.com, jweiner@...hat.com, prarit@...hat.com,
x86@...nel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Part1 PATCH v5 04/22] x86, ACPI: Search buffer above 4GB in a
second try for acpi initrd table override
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 09:02:51PM +0800, Tang Chen wrote:
> From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
>
> Now we only search buffer for new acpi tables in initrd under
> 4GB. In some case, like user use memmap to exclude all low ram,
> we may not find range for it under 4GB. So do second try to
> search for buffer above 4GB.
>
> Since later accessing to the tables is using early_ioremap(),
Maybe "later accesses to the tables" would read better?
> using memory above 4GB is OK.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
> Cc: linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
> Tested-by: Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de>
> Reviewed-by: Tang Chen <tangchen@...fujitsu.com>
> Tested-by: Tang Chen <tangchen@...fujitsu.com>
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists