[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51BF7EE9.8060308@caviumnetworks.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 14:26:01 -0700
From: David Daney <ddaney@...iumnetworks.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
David Daney <david.daney@...ium.com>,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 3.10-rc6
On 06/17/2013 02:13 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Jun 2013 14:08:13 -0700 David Daney <ddaney@...iumnetworks.com> wrote:
>
>>>
>>> I think switch-back-to-a-macro is simplest and safest for now. Perhaps
>>> you can queue a 3.11 patch which restores the C function and fixes up
>>> mn10300 and ia64?
>>>
>>
>> If the patch is reverted, I will do that.
>
> I'm not proposing that we revert f21afc25f9ed4. Retain its
> functionality, but do it via a macro for 3.10.
>
I misread your patch. Your patch may be incorrect in that the flags
variable you introduce has name space collisions with code using the
macro. Linus found this exact problem with the first version of my
patch (which was identical to your patch).
Once you fix the name of 'flags', I hope you don't run into the same
Include Hell on ia64 and mn10300 that I did.
David Daney
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists