lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 17 Jun 2013 17:22:30 -0600
From:	Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@...com>
To:	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Cc:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de>,
	Tang Chen <tangchen@...fujitsu.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 04/22] x86, ACPI: Search buffer above 4G in second
 try for acpi override tables

On Fri, 2013-06-14 at 17:56 -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> Now we only search buffer for override acpi table under 4G.
> In some case, like user use memmap to exclude all low ram,
> we may not find range for it under 4G.
> 
> Do second try to search above 4G.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
> Cc: linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
> Tested-by: Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de>
> Reviewed-by: Tang Chen <tangchen@...fujitsu.com>
> Tested-by: Tang Chen <tangchen@...fujitsu.com>
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/osl.c | 4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/osl.c b/drivers/acpi/osl.c
> index 93e3194..42c48fc 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/osl.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/osl.c
> @@ -627,6 +627,10 @@ void __init acpi_initrd_override(void *data, size_t size)
>  	/* under 4G at first, then above 4G */
>  	acpi_tables_addr = memblock_find_in_range(0, (1ULL<<32) - 1,
>  					all_tables_size, PAGE_SIZE);
> +	if (!acpi_tables_addr)
> +		acpi_tables_addr = memblock_find_in_range(0,
> +					~(phys_addr_t)0,
> +					all_tables_size, PAGE_SIZE);

Should this search start from 4G, instead of 0?

Thanks,
-Toshi


>  	if (!acpi_tables_addr) {
>  		WARN_ON(1);
>  		return;


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ