[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130617233827.GP32663@mtj.dyndns.org>
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 16:38:27 -0700
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Tang Chen <tangchen@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...e.hu, hpa@...or.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, trenn@...e.de, yinghai@...nel.org,
jiang.liu@...wei.com, wency@...fujitsu.com, laijs@...fujitsu.com,
isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com, mgorman@...e.de,
minchan@...nel.org, mina86@...a86.com, gong.chen@...ux.intel.com,
vasilis.liaskovitis@...fitbricks.com, lwoodman@...hat.com,
riel@...hat.com, jweiner@...hat.com, prarit@...hat.com,
x86@...nel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Part1 PATCH v5 07/22] x86, ACPI: Store override acpi tables
phys addr in cpio files info array
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 09:02:54PM +0800, Tang Chen wrote:
> -static struct cpio_data __initdata acpi_initrd_files[ACPI_OVERRIDE_TABLES];
> +struct file_pos {
> + phys_addr_t data;
> + phys_addr_t size;
> +};
Isn't file_pos too generic as name? Would acpi_initrd_file_pos too
long? Maybe just struct acpi_initrd_file?
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists