[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130618081931.GB13677@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 10:19:31 +0200
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
To: Glauber Costa <glommer@...il.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: slab shrinkers: BUG at mm/list_lru.c:92
On Tue 18-06-13 02:30:05, Glauber Costa wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 02:35:08PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
[...]
> > The trace says shrink_slab_node->super_cache_scan->prune_icache_sb. So
> > it's inodes?
> >
> Assuming there is no memory corruption of any sort going on , let's
> check the code. nr_item is only manipulated in 3 places:
>
> 1) list_lru_add, where it is increased
> 2) list_lru_del, where it is decreased in case the user have voluntarily removed the
> element from the list
> 3) list_lru_walk_node, where an element is removing during shrink.
>
> All three excerpts seem to be correctly locked, so something like this
> indicates an imbalance. Either the element was never added to the
> list, or it was added, removed, and we didn't notice it. (Again, your
> backing storage is not XFS, is it? If it is , we have another user to
> look for)
No this is ext3. But I can try to test with xfs as well if it helps.
[...]
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists