linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH] regulator: palmas: enable all modes for SMPS10

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <51C01A07.7030805@ti.com>
Date:	Tue, 18 Jun 2013 13:57:51 +0530
From:	Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>
To:	Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>
CC:	"gg@...mlogic.co.uk" <gg@...mlogic.co.uk>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
	"lgirdwood@...il.com" <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	"sameo@...ux.intel.com" <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"balbi@...com" <balbi@...com>, Keerthy <a0393675@...com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] regulator: palmas: enable all modes for SMPS10

Hi,

On Friday 14 June 2013 06:04 PM, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
> On Wednesday 12 June 2013 08:53 PM, gg@...mlogic.co.uk wrote:
>> On 2013-06-12 15:51, Mark Brown wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 03:31:09PM +0100, gg@...mlogic.co.uk wrote:
>>>> On 2013-06-12 15:14, Mark Brown wrote:
>>>>> Yes, that seems like the most obvious thing here as far as I can tell
>>>> >from the frankly fragmented and obscure information but given all the
>>>>> confusion that seems to exist among the people working on the driver
>>>>> it's really not clear if there's something else going on.
>>>> What about the case where they are inputs? For bus power?
>>> So the current flow can change direction here?
>> Just rechecked the data sheet and it looks like that use-case has
>> actually been
>> removed from more recent data sheets.
>>
>> So ignore me, yes now it can be modelled by two regulators!
>
> Thanks for concluding on this.
>
> Kishon,
> Are you going to send new patch for splitting this regulator or should I
> send for this?

I'll send by today or tomorrow.

Thanks
Kishon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/