[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130618103534.GW2718@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 11:35:35 +0100
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To: Jonas Jensen <jonas.jensen@...il.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
arm@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: irqchip: add support for MOXA ART SoCs
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 11:59:44AM +0200, Jonas Jensen wrote:
> +void moxart_irq_ack(struct irq_data *irqd)
> +{
> + unsigned int irq = irqd_to_hwirq(irqd);
> +
> + writel(1 << irq, IRQ_CLEAR(moxart_irq_base));
> +}
> +
> +static void moxart_irq_mask(struct irq_data *irqd)
> +{
> + unsigned int irq = irqd_to_hwirq(irqd);
> + unsigned int mask;
> +
> + mask = readl(IRQ_MASK(moxart_irq_base));
> + mask &= ~(1 << irq);
> + writel(mask, IRQ_MASK(moxart_irq_base));
> +}
> +
> +static void moxart_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *irqd)
> +{
> + unsigned int irq = irqd_to_hwirq(irqd);
> + unsigned int mask;
> +
> + mask = readl(IRQ_MASK(moxart_irq_base));
> + mask |= (1 << irq);
> + writel(mask, IRQ_MASK(moxart_irq_base));
> +}
Is there a reason this isn't using the irq_chip_generic stuff which would
eliminate all the above?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists