[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51C0728E.6060900@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 17:45:34 +0300
From: Eliezer Tamir <eliezer.tamir@...ux.intel.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
CC: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
Don Skidmore <donald.c.skidmore@...el.com>,
e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, HPA <hpa@...or.com>,
Eilon Greenstien <eilong@...adcom.com>,
Or Gerlitz <or.gerlitz@...il.com>,
Amir Vadai <amirv@...lanox.com>,
Alex Rosenbaum <alexr@...lanox.com>,
Avner Ben Hanoch <avnerb@...lanox.com>,
Or Kehati <ork@...lanox.com>, sockperf-dev@...glegroups.com,
Eliezer Tamir <eliezer@...ir.org.il>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] net: poll/select low latency socket support
On 18/06/2013 17:35, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-06-18 at 16:25 +0300, Eliezer Tamir wrote:
>
>> One other thing,
>> sock_poll() will only ll_poll if the flag was set _and_ the socket has a
>> none-zero value in sk->sk_ll_usec so you still only poll on sockets
>> that were enabled for LLS, not on every socket.
>
> But sockets are default enabled for LLS.
>
> sock_init_data()
> {
> ...
> sk->sk_ll_usec = sysctl_net_ll_poll;
> ...
> }
Yes, if you want to globally enable.
But now that we have the socket option, you can leave the global
setting at 0 and only enable specific sockets via the socket option.
(I have tested this with a modified sockperf and it works.)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists