[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51C074C4.5000601@ti.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 20:25:00 +0530
From: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>
To: <balbi@...com>
CC: <grant.likely@...aro.org>, <tony@...mide.com>, <arnd@...db.de>,
<swarren@...dia.com>, <sylvester.nawrocki@...il.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>, <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
<akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
<rob@...dley.net>, <b-cousson@...com>, <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
<benoit.cousson@...aro.org>, <mchehab@...hat.com>,
<cesarb@...arb.net>, <davem@...emloft.net>, <rnayak@...com>,
<shawn.guo@...aro.org>, <santosh.shilimkar@...com>,
<devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org>, <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
<nsekhar@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 5/9] ARM: OMAP: USB: Add phy binding information
Hi,
On Tuesday 18 June 2013 06:05 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 04:43:44PM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 03:34:36PM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
>>>> On Tuesday 18 June 2013 03:14 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 02:13:55PM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
>>>>>> In order for controllers to get PHY in case of non dt boot, the phy
>>>>>> binding information (phy device name) should be added in the platform
>>>>>> data of the controller.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>
>>>>>
>>>>> I would rather not pass strings around, any other way to handle this ?
>>>>> Why do you need to pass this string ?
>>>>
>>>> Our old way of binding the controller and the phy using device name
>>>> started creating problems after the devices are created using
>>>> PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO. Infact non-dt boot is broken in mainline for
>>>> OMAP3 platforms for which I have posted a RFC series
>>>> http://www.serverphorums.com/read.php?12,708632 which also uses
>>>> strings.
>>>> I'm not sure of any other way to deal with this.
>>>
>>> have you checked how other frameworks handle it ? Regulator has some
>>> sort of binding in board-files, but I guess it passes the regulator
>>> name?
>>
>> From whatever I could make of, regulator has 3 ways to get the
>> regulator one of which is using the binding in board-files (but it
>> also uses device name which could create the same problem that we are
>> facing).
>>
>> 1.) from dt data
>> 2.) from _supply_ name
>> 3.) from binding in board file
>>
>> (referred regulator_dev_lookup() in regulator/core.c)
>
> right, spot on. Which means we don't have a better, more elegant
> solution now. Let's go ahead with this.
Ok. So I'll drop RFC and resend this patch series
http://www.serverphorums.com/read.php?12,708632
Thanks
Kishon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists