[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130618151954.GB16094@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 17:19:54 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: mingo@...hat.com, linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org,
patches@...aro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
robin.randhawa@....com, Steve.Bannister@....com,
Liviu.Dudau@....com, charles.garcia-tobin@....com,
arvind.chauhan@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] sched: don't call get_group() for covered cpus
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 03:45:15PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 18 June 2013 15:33, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 04:32:44PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> >> In build_sched_groups() we don't need to call get_group() for cpus which are
> >> already covered in previous iterations. So, call get_group() after checking if
> >> cpu is covered or not.
> >>
> >
> > Aside from not needing it; doing it would mark the group used and
> > eventually leak it since we wouldn't connect it and not find it again to
> > free it, right?
> >
> > So effectively this fixes a memory leak?
>
> Exactly. To be precise: In cases where sg->cpumask contained more
> than one cpu (For any topology level), this patch helps freeing sg's
> memory for all cpus leaving the group leader.
>
> May I update the logs again?
Sure. Just send a new patch and I'll substitute.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists