[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+5PVA4by9=gaXz7nuiQE4RT4LKvDzYUDS__uNx0KXmLWHDJFw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 12:25:09 -0400
From: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...il.com>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Joshua Covington <joshuacov@...glemail.com>,
"Linux-Kernel@...r. Kernel. Org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] x86, mtrr: Fix original mtrr range get for mtrr_cleanup
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 4:17 PM, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org> wrote:
> Joshua reported: Commit cd7b304dfaf1 (x86, range: fix missing merge
> during add range) broke mtrr cleanup on his setup in 3.9.5.
> corresponding commit in upstream is fbe06b7bae7c.
>
> *BAD*gran_size: 64K chunk_size: 16M num_reg: 6 lose cover RAM: -0G
>
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=59491
>
> So it rejects new var mtrr layout.
>
> It turns out we have some problem with initial mtrr range retrievel.
> current sequence is:
> x86_get_mtrr_mem_range
> ==> bunchs of add_range_with_merge
> ==> bunchs of subract_range
> ==> clean_sort_range
> add_range_with_merge for [0,1M)
> sort_range()
>
> add_range_with_merge could have blank slots, so we can not just
> sort only, that will have final result have extra blank slot in head.
>
> So move that calling add_range_with_merge for [0,1M), with that we
> could avoid extra clean_sort_range calling.
>
> Reported-by: Joshua Covington <joshuacov@...glemail.com>
> Tested-by: Joshua Covington <joshuacov@...glemail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
> Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org> v3.9
We're at -rc6 now and this and it's companion aren't in Linus' tree,
which means the broken 3.9.y stable series doesn't have them either.
It's been posted for a while now, and v3 was really a minor cleanup.
Is there some reason this is still not merged? We've been carrying v2
in Fedora for a bit now and it's cleared up the issue for a number of
people.
josh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists