[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130618173038.GD16094@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 19:30:38 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: mingo@...hat.com, linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org,
patches@...aro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
robin.randhawa@....com, Steve.Bannister@....com,
Liviu.Dudau@....com, charles.garcia-tobin@....com,
arvind.chauhan@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] sched: don't call get_group() for covered cpus
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 08:59:39PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 18 June 2013 20:49, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> > Sure. Just send a new patch and I'll substitute.
>
> This is the new log (patch is attached):
>
> sched: Fix memory leakage in build_sched_groups()
>
> In build_sched_groups() we don't need to call get_group() for cpus which are
> already covered in previous iterations. Calling get_group() would mark the group
> used and eventually leak it since we wouldn't connect it and not find it again
> to free it.
>
> This will happen only in cases where sg->cpumask contained more than one cpu
> (For any topology level). This patch would free sg's memory for all cpus leaving
> the group leader as the group isn't marked used now.
>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists