[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130618174047.GA21738@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 10:40:47 -0700
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Juan David Gonzalez Cobas <juan.david.gonzalez.cobas@...n.ch>
Cc: Alessandro Rubini <rubini@...dd.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
cota@...ap.org, siglesias@...lia.com, rob@...dley.net,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] FMC: add core bus driver
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 09:30:00AM +0200, Juan David Gonzalez Cobas wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 1:38 AM, Alessandro Rubini <rubini@...dd.com> wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>
>
> Yes, it was intended. I don't think it's an issue for merging, but
> I understand you've seen so many such undesired copy-paste errors.
>
>
> CERN policies favour GPLv3 as default open source license as a recommendation.
> The "GPLv2 or later" is, in effect, intentional.
Ok, thanks for verifying this.
> >> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(fmc_driver_unregister);
> >
> > Any specific reason these aren't EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL()?
> >
> > Again, just have to ask.
>
> I think we want to allow for proprietary FMC drivers. I personally
> don't feel this is a core kernel technology. But I'll let David Cobas
> expand on CERN policies, as I'm only a consultant.
>
>
> CERN policies (mostly recommendations) concern esp. the return of
> investment of taxpayer money to society. In view of the potential use
> cases of FMC, EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL would better serve that
> purpose than merely allowing proprietary modules, so GPL exports
> are fine.
Great.
Alessandro, care to respin the patches that I didn't apply and resend
them so that I can?
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists