linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] hugetlb fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130618185055.GA27618@logfs.org>
Date:	Tue, 18 Jun 2013 14:50:55 -0400
From:	Jörn Engel <joern@...fs.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] hugetlb fixes

On Tue, 18 June 2013 14:47:03 -0400, Joern Engel wrote:
> 
> Test program below is failing before these two patches and passing
> after.

Actually, do we have a place to stuff kernel tests?  And if not,
should we have one?

Jörn

--
My second remark is that our intellectual powers are rather geared to
master static relations and that our powers to visualize processes
evolving in time are relatively poorly developed.
-- Edsger W. Dijkstra
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/