linux-kernel - Re: [ 00/48] 3.9.7-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130618221114.GA11055@kroah.com>
Date:	Tue, 18 Jun 2013 15:11:14 -0700
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@...ah.com>
To:	Shuah Khan <shuah.kh@...sung.com>
Cc:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"torvalds@...ux-foundation.org" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
	"shuahkhan@...il.com" <shuahkhan@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [ 00/48] 3.9.7-stable review

On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 09:55:13PM +0000, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 06/18/2013 11:24 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> >
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.9.7 release.
> > There are 48 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Thu Jun 20 16:15:42 UTC 2013.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > 	kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.9.7-rc1.gz
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
> >
> 
> Patches applied cleanly to 3.0.82, 3.4.49, and 3.9.6
> 
> Compiled and booted on the following systems:
> 
> Samsung Series 9 900X4C Intel Corei5:
>      (3.4.50-rc1, and 3.9.7-rc1)
> HP ProBook 6475b AMD A10-4600M APU with Radeon(tm) HD Graphics:
>      (3.0.83-rc1, 3.4.50-rc1, and 3.9.7-rc1)
> 
> dmesgs for all releases look good. No regressions compared to the 
> previous dmesgs for each of these releases.

Great, thanks for testing and letting me know.

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/