[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKohponXvsP7yrvkmbAD1aMp6AQCp6gqaJ2L97h4kQmGFbKH3g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 11:48:00 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Xiaoguang Chen <chenxg@...vell.com>
Cc: rjw@...k.pl, cpufreq@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, njiang1@...vell.com,
zjwu@...vell.com, ylmao@...vell.com, chenxg.marvell@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7] Cpufreq: Fix governor start/stop race condition
On 19 June 2013 10:54, Xiaoguang Chen <chenxg@...vell.com> wrote:
> Cpufreq governor's stop and start operation should be kept in sequence.
> If not, there will be unexpected behavior, for example:
>
> There are 4 CPUs and policy->cpu=CPU0, CPU1/2/3 are linked to CPU0.
> The normal sequence is as below:
>
> 1) Current governor is userspace, One application tries to set
> governor to ondemand. It will call __cpufreq_set_policy in which it
> will stop userspace governor and then start ondemand governor.
>
> 2) Current governor is userspace, Now CPU0 hotplugs in CPU3(put CPU3 online),
You need a space before (
:(
Otherwise looks good. Add my
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists