[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACVXFVMhVs7Wy1A=TfczYzHLFwyRPhEGW9Yo9hTERekaxSnpdQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 14:58:39 +0800
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...onical.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core tree with the
driver-core.current tree
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 1:32 PM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the driver-core tree got a conflict in
> drivers/base/firmware_class.c between commit 875979368eb4 ("firmware
> loader: fix use-after-free by double abort") from the driver-core.current
> tree and commit fe304143b0c3 ("firmware: Avoid deadlock of usermodehelper
> lock at shutdown") from the driver-core tree.
>
> I fixed it up (more may be required - see below) and can carry the fix as
> necessary (no action is required).
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
>
> diff --cc drivers/base/firmware_class.c
> index 01e2103,6ede229..0000000
> --- a/drivers/base/firmware_class.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/firmware_class.c
> @@@ -446,22 -452,11 +452,18 @@@ static struct firmware_priv *to_firmwar
> return container_of(dev, struct firmware_priv, dev);
> }
>
> - static void fw_load_abort(struct firmware_priv *fw_priv)
> + static void fw_load_abort(struct firmware_buf *buf)
> {
> - struct firmware_buf *buf = fw_priv->buf;
> -
> + /*
> + * There is a small window in which user can write to 'loading'
> + * between loading done and disappearance of 'loading'
> + */
> + if (test_bit(FW_STATUS_DONE, &buf->status))
> + return;
> +
> + list_del_init(&buf->pending_list);
> set_bit(FW_STATUS_ABORT, &buf->status);
> complete_all(&buf->completion);
> -
> - /* avoid user action after loading abort */
> - fw_priv->buf = NULL;
Hmm, maybe the most important part in the commit 875979368eb4
("firmware loader: fix use-after-free by double abort") has been removed, :-)
In fact, the commit 87597936 is for linus tree only because it is a fix,
so the conflict is caused by merging it with other firmware loader patches
in -next tree.
Greg, I can figure out one patch for -next easily, but it depends you
push it on 3.10-rc or 3.11-rc.
Thanks,
--
Ming Lei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists