lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 19 Jun 2013 09:16:12 +0200
From:	Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@...sung.com>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc:	Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@...sung.com>,
	"cpufreq@...r.kernel.org" <cpufreq@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
	Jonghwa Lee <jonghwa3.lee@...sung.com>,
	Myungjoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@...ess.pl>,
	Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@...aro.org>,
	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
	Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
	Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] cpufreq: Add boost frequency support in core

On Tue, 18 Jun 2013 15:44:56 +0200, Lukasz Majewski wrote:

Dear Viesh, Rafael,

> > 
> > I'd recommend you both to read Documentation/cpu-freq/boost.txt
> > now. :-)  
> 
> 
> According to the documentation:
> "Reading the file is always supported, even if the processor does not
> support boosting. In this case the file will be read-only and always
> reads as "0""
> 
> Hmm, in the proposed patch set, the "boost" attribute is only exported
> when cpufreq driver sets boost_supported flag. 

I would like to clarify the above issue. 

When I've discussed with Viresh previous version of this patch, we have
agreed, that "boost" sysfs attribute [*]:
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/boost

would be only visible when boost_supported flag is set at cpufreq
driver. 

When acpi-cpufreq driver doesn't support boost, the attribute [*]
won't be exported at all. This contradicts the documentation and legacy
acpi-cpufreq behaviour. 

Since I'm affraid to break API (with all its consequences :-) ), I would
like to be sure that this is OK, and thereof I'm allowed to rewrite
documentation accordingly.

I simply need explicit permission from both maintainers :-).

-- 
Best regards,

Lukasz Majewski

Samsung R&D Institute Poland (SRPOL) | Linux Platform Group
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists