[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2302882.NVjP8DdXWY@wuerfel>
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 12:01:06 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: David Daney <ddaney.cavm@...il.com>
Cc: linux-mips@...ux-mips.org, ralf@...ux-mips.org,
Jamie Iles <jamie@...ieiles.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, David Daney <david.daney@...ium.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] tty/8250_dw: Add support for OCTEON UARTS.
On Tuesday 18 June 2013 12:12:53 David Daney wrote:
> +static unsigned int dw8250_serial_inq(struct uart_port *p, int offset)
> +{
> + offset <<= p->regshift;
> +
> + return (u8)__raw_readq(p->membase + offset);
> +}
> +
> +static void dw8250_serial_outq(struct uart_port *p, int offset, int value)
> +{
> + struct dw8250_data *d = p->private_data;
> +
> + if (offset == UART_LCR)
> + d->last_lcr = value;
> +
> + offset <<= p->regshift;
> + __raw_writeq(value, p->membase + offset);
> + dw8250_serial_inq(p, UART_LCR);
> +}
This breaks building on 32 bit architectures as I found on my daily ARM
builds: __raw_writeq cannot be defined on architectures that don't have
native 64 bit data access instructions. It's also wrong to use the
__raw_* variant, which is not guaranteed to be atomic and is not
endian-safe.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists