| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <1371646663.5845.56.camel@marge.simpson.net>
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 14:57:43 +0200
From: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
To: Manfred Spraul <manfred@...orfullife.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr.bueso@...com>, hhuang@...hat.com,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] ipc/sem.c: performance improvements, FIFO
On Tue, 2013-06-18 at 09:14 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-06-18 at 08:48 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > On Sat, 2013-06-15 at 13:10 +0200, Manfred Spraul wrote:
>
> P.S.
>
> > > My current guess:
> > > sem_lock() somehow ends up in lock_array.
>
> Tracing shows that happens precisely one time, at end of benchmark.
FWIW, below is a profile of 3.8-rt scaling to 64 cores. No mucking
about with sem_array, only livelock hack doing it's thing.. whatever
that is.
# Events: 1M cycles
#
# Overhead Symbol
# ........ .......................................
#
16.71% [k] sys_semtimedop
11.31% [k] system_call
11.23% [k] copy_user_generic_string
7.59% [.] __semop
4.88% [k] sem_lock
4.52% [k] rt_spin_lock
4.48% [k] rt_spin_unlock
3.75% [.] worker_thread(void*)
3.56% [k] perform_atomic_semop
3.15% [k] idr_find
3.15% [k] ipc_obtain_object_check
3.04% [k] pid_vnr
2.97% [k] migrate_enable
2.79% [k] migrate_disable
2.46% [k] ipcperms
2.01% [k] sysret_check
1.86% [k] pin_current_cpu
1.49% [k] unpin_current_cpu
1.13% [k] __rcu_read_lock
1.11% [k] __rcu_read_unlock
1.11% [k] ipc_obtain_object
Percent | Source code & Disassembly of vmlinux
------------------------------------------------
:
:
:
: Disassembly of section .text:
:
: ffffffff81273390 <sem_lock>:
: * checking each local lock once. This means that the local lock paths
: * cannot start their critical sections while the global lock is held.
: */
: static inline int sem_lock(struct sem_array *sma, struct sembuf *sops,
: int nsops)
: {
3.90 : ffffffff81273390: 41 55 push %r13
0.00 : ffffffff81273392: 49 89 f5 mov %rsi,%r13
0.00 : ffffffff81273395: 41 54 push %r12
0.00 : ffffffff81273397: 41 89 d4 mov %edx,%r12d
3.86 : ffffffff8127339a: 55 push %rbp
0.00 : ffffffff8127339b: 48 89 fd mov %rdi,%rbp
0.00 : ffffffff8127339e: 53 push %rbx
0.00 : ffffffff8127339f: 48 83 ec 08 sub $0x8,%rsp
: struct sem *sem;
: int locknum;
:
: if (nsops == 1 && !sma->complex_count) {
3.76 : ffffffff812733a3: 83 fa 01 cmp $0x1,%edx
0.00 : ffffffff812733a6: 75 0c jne ffffffff812733b4 <sem_lock+0x24>
0.00 : ffffffff812733a8: 44 8b 87 a4 00 00 00 mov 0xa4(%rdi),%r8d
8.92 : ffffffff812733af: 45 85 c0 test %r8d,%r8d
0.00 : ffffffff812733b2: 74 5c je ffffffff81273410 <sem_lock+0x80>
: * individual semaphore locks to go away. The code
: * above ensures no new single-lock holders will enter
: * their critical section while the array lock is held.
: */
: lock_array:
: spin_lock(&sma->sem_perm.lock);
0.00 : ffffffff812733b4: e8 57 4b e1 ff callq ffffffff81087f10 <migrate_disable>
0.00 : ffffffff812733b9: 48 89 ef mov %rbp,%rdi
0.00 : ffffffff812733bc: e8 1f d4 34 00 callq ffffffff815c07e0 <rt_spin_lock>
: wait_array:
: for (i = 0; i < sma->sem_nsems; i++) {
0.00 : ffffffff812733c1: 8b 8d a0 00 00 00 mov 0xa0(%rbp),%ecx
0.00 : ffffffff812733c7: 85 c9 test %ecx,%ecx
0.00 : ffffffff812733c9: 7e 2b jle ffffffff812733f6 <sem_lock+0x66>
0.00 : ffffffff812733cb: 31 db xor %ebx,%ebx
0.00 : ffffffff812733cd: 0f 1f 00 nopl (%rax)
: sem = sma->sem_base + i;
0.00 : ffffffff812733d0: 48 63 c3 movslq %ebx,%rax
0.00 : ffffffff812733d3: 48 c1 e0 07 shl $0x7,%rax
0.00 : ffffffff812733d7: 48 03 45 68 add 0x68(%rbp),%rax
: #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_BASE
: if (spin_is_locked(&sem->lock))
0.00 : ffffffff812733db: 48 83 78 20 00 cmpq $0x0,0x20(%rax)
0.00 : ffffffff812733e0: 74 09 je ffffffff812733eb <sem_lock+0x5b>
: #endif
: spin_unlock_wait(&sem->lock);
0.00 : ffffffff812733e2: 48 8d 78 08 lea 0x8(%rax),%rdi
0.00 : ffffffff812733e6: e8 b5 d4 34 00 callq ffffffff815c08a0 <rt_spin_unlock_wait>
: * their critical section while the array lock is held.
: */
: lock_array:
: spin_lock(&sma->sem_perm.lock);
: wait_array:
: for (i = 0; i < sma->sem_nsems; i++) {
0.00 : ffffffff812733eb: 83 c3 01 add $0x1,%ebx
0.00 : ffffffff812733ee: 39 9d a0 00 00 00 cmp %ebx,0xa0(%rbp)
0.00 : ffffffff812733f4: 7f da jg ffffffff812733d0 <sem_lock+0x40>
: #endif
: spin_unlock_wait(&sem->lock);
: }
: locknum = -1;
:
: if (nsops == 1 && !sma->complex_count) {
0.00 : ffffffff812733f6: 41 83 ec 01 sub $0x1,%r12d
0.00 : ffffffff812733fa: 74 51 je ffffffff8127344d <sem_lock+0xbd>
: spin_unlock(&sma->sem_perm.lock);
: locknum = sops->sem_num;
: }
: }
: return locknum;
: }
0.00 : ffffffff812733fc: 48 83 c4 08 add $0x8,%rsp
:
: if (nsops == 1 && !sma->complex_count) {
: sem = sma->sem_base + sops->sem_num;
: spin_lock(&sem->lock);
: spin_unlock(&sma->sem_perm.lock);
: locknum = sops->sem_num;
0.00 : ffffffff81273400: b8 ff ff ff ff mov $0xffffffff,%eax
: }
: }
: return locknum;
: }
0.00 : ffffffff81273405: 5b pop %rbx
0.00 : ffffffff81273406: 5d pop %rbp
0.00 : ffffffff81273407: 41 5c pop %r12
0.00 : ffffffff81273409: 41 5d pop %r13
0.00 : ffffffff8127340b: c3 retq
0.00 : ffffffff8127340c: 0f 1f 40 00 nopl 0x0(%rax)
: {
: struct sem *sem;
: int locknum;
:
: if (nsops == 1 && !sma->complex_count) {
: sem = sma->sem_base + sops->sem_num;
3.69 : ffffffff81273410: 0f b7 1e movzwl (%rsi),%ebx
0.01 : ffffffff81273413: 48 c1 e3 07 shl $0x7,%rbx
3.98 : ffffffff81273417: 48 03 5f 68 add 0x68(%rdi),%rbx
: /*
: * Another process is holding the global lock on the
: * sem_array; we cannot enter our critical section,
: * but have to wait for the global lock to be released.
: */
: if (unlikely(spin_is_locked(&sma->sem_perm.lock))) {
10.68 : ffffffff8127341b: 48 83 7f 18 00 cmpq $0x0,0x18(%rdi)
22.07 : ffffffff81273420: 75 60 jne ffffffff81273482 <sem_lock+0xf2>
: */
: spin_lock(&sem->lock);
: spin_unlock(&sma->sem_perm.lock);
: } else {
: /* Lock just the semaphore we are interested in. */
: spin_lock(&sem->lock);
0.01 : ffffffff81273422: 48 83 c3 08 add $0x8,%rbx
3.69 : ffffffff81273426: e8 e5 4a e1 ff callq ffffffff81087f10 <migrate_disable>
7.42 : ffffffff8127342b: 48 89 df mov %rbx,%rdi
0.00 : ffffffff8127342e: e8 ad d3 34 00 callq ffffffff815c07e0 <rt_spin_lock>
:
: /*
: * If sma->complex_count was set prior to acquisition,
: * we must fall back to the global array lock.
: */
: if (unlikely(sma->complex_count)) {
3.75 : ffffffff81273433: 8b b5 a4 00 00 00 mov 0xa4(%rbp),%esi
16.44 : ffffffff81273439: 85 f6 test %esi,%esi
0.00 : ffffffff8127343b: 75 68 jne ffffffff812734a5 <sem_lock+0x115>
:
: if (nsops == 1 && !sma->complex_count) {
: sem = sma->sem_base + sops->sem_num;
: spin_lock(&sem->lock);
: spin_unlock(&sma->sem_perm.lock);
: locknum = sops->sem_num;
0.00 : ffffffff8127343d: 41 0f b7 45 00 movzwl 0x0(%r13),%eax
: }
: }
: return locknum;
: }
0.00 : ffffffff81273442: 48 83 c4 08 add $0x8,%rsp
3.94 : ffffffff81273446: 5b pop %rbx
0.00 : ffffffff81273447: 5d pop %rbp
0.01 : ffffffff81273448: 41 5c pop %r12
3.86 : ffffffff8127344a: 41 5d pop %r13
0.00 : ffffffff8127344c: c3 retq
: #endif
: spin_unlock_wait(&sem->lock);
: }
: locknum = -1;
:
: if (nsops == 1 && !sma->complex_count) {
0.00 : ffffffff8127344d: 8b 95 a4 00 00 00 mov 0xa4(%rbp),%edx
0.00 : ffffffff81273453: 85 d2 test %edx,%edx
0.00 : ffffffff81273455: 75 a5 jne ffffffff812733fc <sem_lock+0x6c>
: sem = sma->sem_base + sops->sem_num;
0.00 : ffffffff81273457: 41 0f b7 5d 00 movzwl 0x0(%r13),%ebx
0.00 : ffffffff8127345c: 48 c1 e3 07 shl $0x7,%rbx
0.00 : ffffffff81273460: 48 03 5d 68 add 0x68(%rbp),%rbx
: spin_lock(&sem->lock);
0.00 : ffffffff81273464: e8 a7 4a e1 ff callq ffffffff81087f10 <migrate_disable>
0.00 : ffffffff81273469: 48 8d 7b 08 lea 0x8(%rbx),%rdi
0.00 : ffffffff8127346d: e8 6e d3 34 00 callq ffffffff815c07e0 <rt_spin_lock>
: spin_unlock(&sma->sem_perm.lock);
0.00 : ffffffff81273472: 48 89 ef mov %rbp,%rdi
0.00 : ffffffff81273475: e8 e6 d3 34 00 callq ffffffff815c0860 <rt_spin_unlock>
0.00 : ffffffff8127347a: e8 41 48 e1 ff callq ffffffff81087cc0 <migrate_enable>
0.00 : ffffffff8127347f: 90 nop
0.00 : ffffffff81273480: eb bb jmp ffffffff8127343d <sem_lock+0xad>
0.00 : ffffffff81273482: 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 nopw 0x0(%rax,%rax,1)
: * Another process is holding the global lock on the
: * sem_array; we cannot enter our critical section,
: * but have to wait for the global lock to be released.
: */
: if (unlikely(spin_is_locked(&sma->sem_perm.lock))) {
: spin_lock(&sma->sem_perm.lock);
0.00 : ffffffff81273488: e8 83 4a e1 ff callq ffffffff81087f10 <migrate_disable>
0.00 : ffffffff8127348d: 48 89 ef mov %rbp,%rdi
0.00 : ffffffff81273490: e8 4b d3 34 00 callq ffffffff815c07e0 <rt_spin_lock>
: if (sma->complex_count)
0.00 : ffffffff81273495: 8b bd a4 00 00 00 mov 0xa4(%rbp),%edi
0.00 : ffffffff8127349b: 85 ff test %edi,%edi
0.00 : ffffffff8127349d: 0f 85 1e ff ff ff jne ffffffff812733c1 <sem_lock+0x31>
0.00 : ffffffff812734a3: eb bf jmp ffffffff81273464 <sem_lock+0xd4>
: /*
: * If sma->complex_count was set prior to acquisition,
: * we must fall back to the global array lock.
: */
: if (unlikely(sma->complex_count)) {
: spin_unlock(&sem->lock);
0.00 : ffffffff812734a5: 48 89 df mov %rbx,%rdi
0.00 : ffffffff812734a8: e8 b3 d3 34 00 callq ffffffff815c0860 <rt_spin_unlock>
0.00 : ffffffff812734ad: 0f 1f 00 nopl (%rax)
0.00 : ffffffff812734b0: e8 0b 48 e1 ff callq ffffffff81087cc0 <migrate_enable>
: goto lock_array;
0.00 : ffffffff812734b5: e9 fa fe ff ff jmpq ffffffff812733b4 <sem_lock+0x24>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists